With the continuous improvement of living standards of residents in China, the
demand of urban residents for various indoor and outdoor leisure and sports activities
presents the characteristics of increasing quantification and diversity. Leisure sports facilities do not have a scope. They are generally divided into public
welfare and profitability. Among them, public welfare facilities mainly choose sports
centers and school venues provided by the government. These data can be obtained by
official website of the government. While profitability facilities mainly include
special sports venues, such as swimming halls, basketball halls, etc. These data are
POI which can be gotten by network crawling tools. The public welfare and
profitability facilities are complements each other and provides urban residents with a
comprehensive demand for leisure sports activities. The study take Suzhou as an example. From the point of view of residents, the
shortest distance from each residential area to the nearest leisure sports facilities is
calculated, and the average shortest distance of each district is counted with the
district as the statistical unit. At the same time, from the point of view of leisure sports
facilities, the area of residential areas that can be covered by different modes of
transportation such as walking and bicycle in different time periods can also be
searched and counted. From the above two aspects, this paper evaluates the service
level of leisure sports facilities at two levels of city and different administrative
districts. Key w