The updated trends and solar response in stratospheric ozone based on satellite data and model simulations
编号:2314 访问权限:私有 更新:2023-04-27 13:14:39 浏览:187次 特邀报告

报告开始:2023年05月07日 08:15(Asia/Shanghai)

报告时间:15min

所在会场:[13B] 13B、大气物理与气象气候 [13B-1] 13B-1 大气物理和大气探测

演示文件

提示:该报告下的文件权限为私有,您尚未登录,暂时无法查看。

摘要
We use the TOMCAT 3-D off-line chemical transport model (CTM) to investigate the seasonal ozone trends and solar response in stratospheric ozone. The model simulations forced with European Centre for Medium-Range Weather Forecasts (ECMWF) reanalyses (ERA-Interim and ERA5) data, A_ERAI and B_ERA5, are compared to observation-based data sets, the Stratospheric Water and OzOne Satellite Homogenized (SWOOSH, Davis et al., 2016) database (1984-2020) and machine learning based satellite-corrected data (ML-TOMCAT, Dhomse et al., 2021) for the 1979-2020 time period. We find large differences between the modeled and observed ozone profiles and simulation B_ERA5 does not perform better in simulating the observed stratospheric ozone when compared to A_ERAI (Li et al., 2022).
We employ a multi-variate regression model (MLR) to estimate the trends and solar cycle signals (SCS) in both the modelled and observed ozone profiles. Both the ordinary least squares (OLS) and regularised regression methods (Ridge/Lasso) are used for comparison. The MLR includes independent linear trends before and after peak stratospheric halogen loading in 1997, Quasi-Biennial Oscillation (QBO) terms at 30 hPa and 10 hPa, El-Nino Southern Oscillation (ENSO), Arctic Oscillation (AO), Antarctic Oscillation (AAO) index as well as the vertical component of the E-P flux or the age-of-air (AoA) tracer to account for the effects of dynamical variability. We find that both ozone trends and SCS vary with the fit methods, datasets and analysis periods. ML-TOMCAT data agree better with SWOOSH data in ozone trends and SCS than the two model simulations do. AoA associated transport changes the lower stratospheric ozone trends as well as the solar cycle estimates, which suggests the stratospheric dynamics might have influenced the stratospheric ozone, particularly in the lower stratosphere, resulting in the significantly different SCS.
References:
Davis, S.M., Rosenlof, K.H., Hassler, B., Hurst, D.F., Read, W.G., Vömel, H., Selkirk, H., Fujiwara, M. and Damadeo, R., 2016. The Stratospheric Water and Ozone Satellite Homogenized (SWOOSH) database: a long-term database for climate studies. Earth system science data, 8(2), pp.461-490.
Dhomse, S.S., Arosio, C., Feng, W., Rozanov, A., Weber, M. and Chipperfield, M.P., 2021. ML-TOMCAT: machine-learning-based satellite-corrected global stratospheric ozone profile data set from a chemical transport model. Earth System Science Data, 13(12), pp.5711-5729.
Li, Y., Dhomse, S. S., Chipperfield, M. P., Feng, W., Chrysanthou, A., Xia, Y., and Guo, D., 2022. Effects of reanalysis forcing fields on ozone trends and age of air from a chemical transport model, Atmos. Chem. Phys., 22, 10635–10656.
 
关键词
ozone,trends,stratosphere,solar response
报告人
李亚娟
南京晓庄学院

稿件作者
LiYajuan Nanjing Xiaozhuang University
发表评论
验证码 看不清楚,更换一张
全部评论
重要日期
  • 会议日期

    05月05日

    2023

    05月08日

    2023

  • 03月31日 2023

    初稿截稿日期

  • 05月25日 2023

    注册截止日期

主办单位
青年地学论坛理事会
中国科学院青年创新促进会地学分会
承办单位
武汉大学
中国科学院精密测量科学与技术创新研究院
中国地质大学(武汉)
联系方式
历届会议
移动端
在手机上打开
小程序
打开微信小程序
客服
扫码或点此咨询